Best AI Agents and Software for Staffing Agencies (2026)

By Sparsh Goyal, Founder at The Cognitive. Published 2026-10-29 · Last updated 2026-11-04

• The best AI agents for staffing agencies in 2026 start with The Cognitive, the one platform here that sources, emails, interviews by live AI video and syncs with your ATS.
• Juicebox and Pin suit small agencies that want self-serve sourcing and outreach, hireEZ larger staffing firms and RPOs, and Bullhorn Amplify agencies already on Bullhorn.
• For call notes and submittals pick CoRecruit, for an AI-first CRM pick Atlas, and for screening applicants at volume pick Sense or ConverzAI.

The best AI agents for staffing agencies in 2026 start with The Cognitive, the staffing AI software for agencies that need candidates outside their own database, contacted and interviewed live before they reach the client. Juicebox suits small agencies that want self-serve AI sourcing, Pin an AI recruiter that books intro calls from a client brief, and hireEZ larger staffing firms and RPOs. Bullhorn Amplify is the pick if your agency already runs on Bullhorn, and CoRecruit if call notes and submittals eat your week. Sense or ConverzAI fit if you screen applicants at volume.

Disclosure: The Cognitive is our product.

The fastest-growing staffing firms already run AI on the desk. In Bullhorn's GRID 2026 Industry Trends report (25 February 2026), 78 percent of staffing firms growing revenue by 25% or more use AI tools embedded in their applicant tracking system. Bullhorn sells one of the tools below, so treat that as vendor research.

The best AI agents and software for staffing agencies in 2026

1. The Cognitive: best AI layer for sourcing and interviewing new candidates on top of your agency ATS.
2. Juicebox: best for self-serve AI sourcing on a small-agency plan.
3. Pin: best for an AI recruiter that turns a client brief into booked intro calls.
4. hireEZ: best for larger staffing firms and RPOs running agents on top of their ATS.
5. SourceWhale: best for agency desks that want outreach, a dialler and call notes in one place.
6. Bullhorn Amplify: best for agencies already running on Bullhorn.
7. CoRecruit: best for call notes and client-ready submittals pushed into your ATS.
8. Atlas: best for perm and search agencies that want an AI-first CRM.
9. Sense: best for staffing teams engaging workers by text, WhatsApp and voice.
10. ConverzAI: best for high-volume staffing firms screening applicants by voice.
11. Carv: best for enterprise volume staffing that wants a library of configurable agents.
12. Popp: best for staffing firms that want screening and document collection inside their own systems.

What is staffing AI software, and what is an AI agent for staffing agencies?

Staffing AI software is software that does recruiting work on a staffing or recruitment agency desk. It finds candidates, gets their contact details, writes to them, screens or interviews them, drafts the client submittal or keeps the database current. It is not the system of record. Your agency ATS or CRM still holds the clients, the jobs, the placements and the invoices. An AI agent is the same software set to finish a step on its own, such as following up with a candidate or screening an applicant, and to hand the result back to a recruiter. Several vendors here sell agents by that name: Juicebox Agents, hireEZ EZ Agent, Sense AI Agents, Carv's agent library and Bullhorn Amplify's digital workers.

The tools fall into three kinds:

• An AI layer on top of your ATS. The Cognitive, Juicebox, Pin, hireEZ, CoRecruit, Sense, ConverzAI, Carv and Popp work next to the agency ATS you already run and pass candidates or notes into it.
• AI built into an agency ATS. Bullhorn Amplify lives inside Bullhorn. It works on the data you already hold, and only there.
• An AI-native CRM that replaces your ATS. Atlas, and now SourceWhale with its own CRM and ATS, ask you to move the whole desk into their system.

For where AI helps a staffing business beyond these tools, see our guide to AI staffing solutions. If you need the agency ATS itself, our list of the best recruitment software for agencies ranks those systems. The best staffing software list covers temp desks with payroll and VMS needs.

How do the best AI agents for staffing agencies compare?

Which AI does the whole agency desk, end to end?

An end-to-end AI for a staffing agency takes a new req from first search to a candidate the client can judge. That chain has four steps: find people outside your database, reach out to them, interview them, and pass the result into your ATS. Most tools here own one or two of those steps.

• The Cognitive is the only platform here that does all four in one account: sourcing across about 900M public profiles, email outreach from the recruiter's own mailbox, a live two-way AI video interview and sync with 100+ ATSs.
• hireEZ sources, screens by conversation and schedules on top of your ATS, but it is an enterprise rollout without a live video interview.
• SourceWhale and Atlas cover search, outreach and the CRM, with no AI interview step.
• Bullhorn Amplify matches, screens and builds submittals, but only on the people already in Bullhorn.

End to end still leaves the system of record in place. Clients, placements and invoices stay in your agency ATS, which is why the sync step matters.

How did we choose these 12 AI tools for staffing agencies?

We ranked these tools using feedback from hundreds of recruiters we talk with on LinkedIn, plus each vendor's own site and pricing page.

The long list held 17 AI products sold to recruitment and staffing agencies. Metaview, Loxo, Spott, Leonar and Textkernel did not make the ranked list. Every tool here had to say, on its own site, what its AI does for an agency or staffing desk. We judged each one on four criteria:

• how many desk steps the AI finishes on candidates you do not have yet: find, contact, reach out, screen or interview, prepare the submittal, connect to the ATS;
• whether a team can see a published price;
• whether it works on top of the agency ATS you already run;
• which desk it suits: perm, search, temp or volume.

The order runs in four groups. Sourcing-led tools come first (The Cognitive, Juicebox, Pin, hireEZ, SourceWhale). Next is AI built into an agency ATS (Bullhorn Amplify). Then come tools for calls, notes and the CRM (CoRecruit, Atlas). Last are tools that screen applicants and re-engage the database at volume (Sense, ConverzAI, Carv, Popp).

Within each group, a published price ranks higher. Next, a tool that works on top of your ATS out of the box ranks above one that replaces it or needs a build. The final tie-break is more desk steps. The Cognitive is first because it is the only tool here that sources candidates, emails them, runs a live AI video interview and connects to your ATS. It does that in a self-serve account with a published price. We quote no review-site ratings.

How do you choose staffing AI software?

Where does your desk lose the most hours?

Start with the step that eats the week, not the slickest demo. For most perm desks that is finding and contacting people. For most temp desks it is screening the applicants who already came in. Ashby's 2026 Talent Trends data counts 291 applications per hire, close to three times the early 2021 level.

Do you need people outside your own database?

A database you have worked for years runs dry on niche roles and new clients. In Gem's 2026 benchmarks, a sourced candidate was nearly eight times as likely to be hired as an inbound applicant. If clients pay you to find people they could not find, put a sourcing tool first: The Cognitive, Juicebox, Pin or hireEZ.

Should the AI sit on your ATS or replace it?

A new AI-native CRM can do more than a layer, but it means migrating clients, candidates and placement history. If your agency ATS works, add a layer. Move to Atlas or SourceWhale's CRM only if you were planning to leave your ATS anyway.

Can the AI screen or interview before you submit a candidate?

Screening is where Bullhorn's survey reports some of the clearest gains. In the same GRID 2026 Industry Trends report, which is Bullhorn's own research, 55 percent of firms said AI screening alone improved their KPIs by more than 25 percent. A further 46 percent said AI cut screening time in half or better. ConverzAI and Sense screen by voice, hireEZ runs conversational screening, and The Cognitive runs a live two-way AI video interview.

Match the format to the role. A phone screen suits a warehouse shift, and a video interview suits a client who wants to see the candidate. If you screen for clients with AI, our guide to AI screening compliance covers the rules.

Which tool fits your desk?

• Perm and contingent. Your fee depends on finding people the client could not. The Cognitive fits if you also want the first interview done before you submit, and Juicebox or Pin if outreach is the bottleneck.
• Retained and executive search. CoRecruit removes the notes and submittals, and Atlas suits a firm ready to put business development and delivery in one CRM.
• Temp and volume. Sense, ConverzAI, Carv and Popp screen, schedule and re-engage at scale. For screening in depth, see our list of AI candidate screening tools.
• Healthcare. The Cognitive's live AI interview gets a nurse to a first interview within hours, as our healthcare staffing case study shows. Popp collects documents in the same conversation as the screen.

What is the best AI recruitment platform for a small agency?

A small agency needs a self-serve start, a published price and no long contract. The Cognitive fits if you want sourcing, outreach and the first interview in one account, with individual plans and team plans from 3 seats. Juicebox's Growth tier is "built for small teams, agencies, and startups", and Pin has a free plan. Quote-led enterprise tools such as hireEZ teams and Carv, and 12-month terms at CoRecruit and Atlas, are a bigger bet for a five-desk agency.

How are these tools priced, and can you start without a sales call?

Six of the twelve publish a team price: The Cognitive, Juicebox, Pin, CoRecruit, Atlas and Sense (a starting price). hireEZ publishes one for its solo plan only. CoRecruit and Atlas tie you to a 12-month term. For the other five, the price only comes after a sales conversation. With a custom quote, ask what the bill does when a client pauses hiring.

What should you ask in a staffing AI software demo?

Bring one live req from a real client to every demo, and ask these six questions:

1. Which desk steps does the AI finish, and which does it only draft? See it on your req, not a recording.
2. Where do candidates come from? Your database, the open web, or both.
3. What lands in our ATS, and in which fields? Ask whether it writes back for every candidate or only for those that came from the ATS.
4. What can we send the client? A submittal, a report link or nothing at all.
5. Who sends the messages, and from where? Sending from your own mailbox keeps replies with the recruiter and the relationship in their name.
6. What does the bill do when hiring slows? Seats keep charging, and credits follow usage.

The 12 best AI agents and software for staffing agencies, reviewed

For sourcing depth beyond agencies, see the best AI sourcing tools, and for in-house teams the best recruitment software.

1. The Cognitive: best AI layer for sourcing and interviewing new candidates on top of your agency ATS

Verdict: The Cognitive runs the agency desk from first search to a client-ready interview report, on people who are not yet in your database.

The Cognitive is AI recruiting software for sourcing, outreach and live AI interviews. Paste the client's brief in plain English, and the search runs across about 900M public profiles. Results come 10 people a page, and each result shows a "Why this match" note with one or two reasons from the profile. You see why someone is there before you spend reveal credits on them. A search uses 1 credit per person shown.

A personal email costs 4 credits to reveal and a phone number 12, with verified emails and phone numbers enriched from 30+ sources. Outreach goes out from the recruiter's own Gmail or Outlook mailbox, signed by them, and the follow-ups stop when the person replies.

The step no other sourcing tool here offers is a live two-way AI video interview. The AI interviewer appears on video, the candidate is on camera, and the recruiter picks 10 or 20 minutes. Answers are scored on a fixed rubric for the role, and follow-up questions change with what the candidate says. Cheat detection runs during the interview, and the report shows how the candidate's CV claims held up. You then send the client a read-only link to the report instead of writing up a call.

Two customer-reported results show what that does to an agency:

• A Manchester agency with 8 recruiters and 40+ client companies went from 200 to 1,400 interviews a month. Its cost of interviewing fell 94%, its placement rate rose from 31% to 68%, and it won 12 new client accounts in 3 months (UK staffing agency case study).
• A Toronto healthcare agency cut time to first interview from 5 days to 3 hours. Candidate drop-off fell from 58% to 12%, and it filled 45 positions in 30 days, up from 8 a month (healthcare staffing case study).

The Cognitive connects to 100+ applicant tracking systems, including agency ATSs such as Bullhorn, JobAdder and Vincere. Shortlisted people you sourced go onto a job in your ATS with Send to ATS. Interview results are written back for candidates you imported from the ATS. Team plans add seats, a shared workspace and roles. See how it fits recruitment agencies and staffing agencies.

Best for: perm and contract desks that need candidates outside their database, screened by interview before submittal.

Watch out for: it works alongside your agency ATS, so client records, business development, job posting, placements and invoicing stay there. Interviews run in a laptop or desktop browser. Phone reveals and outreach start on Sourcing Pro.

Pricing model: monthly plans with credits, published, plus per-seat team plans with a 3-seat minimum. AI Sourcing and AI Interviews are separate plans, each from $99 a month. A 20-minute interview uses 100 interview credits.

2. Juicebox: best for self-serve AI sourcing on a small-agency plan

Verdict: Juicebox is the quickest way for a small agency to put AI sourcing and outreach on every desk without a sales cycle.

Juicebox calls itself "the AI Recruiting Platform that learns how you search". It promises to "find top talent from 800M global profiles and 30+ diverse data sources", and its homepage counts 500+ staffing agencies. You search in natural language, spend contact credits on details, and send email sequences that can include "social and call steps".

The newest piece is Juicebox Agents, sold as an add-on. An agent keeps running on a search, then reaches out and follows up with copy you approve, or lines up new profiles for you to review.

Juicebox stops at outreach. With no interview step, screening and the client write-up stay with the recruiter.

Best for: small agencies that want self-serve sourcing and sequences on a published plan.

Watch out for: ATS and CRM integration sits on the Business tier, and agents cost extra per agent.

Pricing model: per seat, tiered (Free, Starter, Growth, and a custom Business tier), plus a per-agent add-on. Prices are on the website.

3. Pin: best for an AI recruiter that turns a client brief into booked intro calls

Verdict: Pin suits agency recruiters who want the AI to work a brief all the way to a booked call.

Pin markets itself as "the AI recruiter for recruiting agencies". Its agency page sums up the workflow: "Hand Pin a client brief. It sources from 850M+ profiles, writes the outreach, sends it from your inbox, sorts the replies and books the calls." Pin says more than 2,000 recruiting teams use it.

That last step sets Pin apart on an agency desk. Pin carries on into the inbox, sorting replies and booking the intro call, and paid plans add channels beyond email.

The call is where Pin stops. Screening, the submittal and the ATS update stay with the recruiter, and Pin runs alongside your agency ATS.

Best for: perm desks that want more first calls from each client brief.

Watch out for: Pin's company page and its CEO's profile have been removed from LinkedIn. In a post on 16 September 2026, Pin's CEO said the product is unaffected.

Pricing model: a free plan and per-user tiers billed annually. Prices are on the website.

4. hireEZ: best for larger staffing firms and RPOs running agents on top of their ATS

Verdict: hireEZ is the broadest agent suite here for staffing firms big enough to configure it.

hireEZ now leads with EZ Agent, billed as "end-to-end agentic recruiting for enterprise teams". It promises "your entire hiring pipeline, run by agents you direct", working on top of your ATS. Its staffing page pitches an "agentic AI advantage for staffing firms and RPOs", and its homepage quotes staffing customers such as Insight Global and Randstad Sourceright.

The agents cover open-web sourcing, applicant review, conversational AI screening, scheduling, email and text campaigns, and analytics. hireEZ also offers rediscovery, which "automatically matches past applicants against new roles".

The cost is weight. hireEZ prices team deployments to "the stack hireEZ replaces" and runs a four-week verification before signing. Compare it in hireEZ vs SeekOut.

Best for: large staffing firms and RPOs that want sourcing, rediscovery and screening agents across many desks.

Watch out for: the enterprise rollout and the scoping before you sign.

Pricing model: per seat. A solo plan has a published price and a 7-day trial; team plans are configured by quote.

5. SourceWhale: best for agency desks that want outreach, a dialler and call notes in one place

Verdict: SourceWhale is the pick for agencies that want one tool for every touch on a candidate, from search to call notes.

SourceWhale calls itself "the AI recruitment platform built on context" and says it "runs your whole desk, from first search to final placement". The platform searches your database and the web, enriches contacts, and sends "Email, SMS, and WhatsApp sent from your own mailbox". A dialler, a notetaker and an Inbox Agent sit in the same product, with a data refresh that keeps records current.

The big change is that SourceWhale now sells its own AI-native CRM and ATS. Until now it sold mainly as an outreach and sourcing layer next to an agency's ATS.

That move makes SourceWhale a bigger decision than an add-on, and it has no AI interview step.

Best for: agency desks that live on calls, texts and WhatsApp as much as email.

Watch out for: pricing is by demo only, and adopting the new CRM means migrating off your current ATS.

Pricing model: custom quote. The pricing page sends you to book a demo.

6. Bullhorn Amplify: best for agencies already running on Bullhorn

Verdict: If your agency runs on Bullhorn, Amplify is the first AI to try, because it already sits on your data.

Bullhorn Amplify is Bullhorn's AI for recruitment, "leveraging a digital workforce and an LLM built for staffing". Its digital workers are called Enrich, Match, Screen, Outreach, Present and Prospect. Screen will "conduct, summarize, and score candidate interviews around the clock", and Present will "instantly generate and deliver branded candidate submissions".

Amplify works on the candidates, jobs and placements already in your Bullhorn database. Bullhorn sells it for its own platform, so there is no separate tool to connect.

That grounding is also the limit. Amplify only works inside Bullhorn, and its matching starts from the database you have. If the right person is not in Bullhorn yet, a sourcing tool has to find them first.

Best for: Bullhorn customers who want AI on the data they already hold.

Watch out for: the digital workers sit in Bullhorn's top tier and Amplify Chat in the Pro tier.

Pricing model: bundled into Bullhorn's tiers, each sold by quote.

7. CoRecruit: best for call notes and client-ready submittals pushed into your ATS

Verdict: CoRecruit takes the write-up off every candidate and client call.

CoRecruit, formerly Quil, bills itself as the "#1 AI Assistant for Recruitment Agencies" and as "AI that makes executive search and recruitment firms more profitable". Its core is a botless AI notetaker. It captures calls on video, phone, WhatsApp and in person, then turns them into client-ready submittals and ATS updates. CoRecruit also offers a VoIP number for recruiters, with US and Canada calling included.

For a mixed agency stack, the integration story is the strongest here. CoRecruit promises "Deep sync: Native mapping for Bullhorn, Vincere, Crelate, Loxo, and 40+ other ATSs", so notes land in the right fields. It has also added sourcing and data enrichment as an add-on.

CoRecruit makes each call more productive but does not create more calls, unless you add the sourcing module.

Best for: recruiters and search consultants who spend evenings writing up calls and submittals.

Watch out for: the 12-month minimum term commits you before you know how the team adopts it.

Pricing model: per user per month with volume tiers and a 12-month minimum term. Prices are on the website, with a 7-day free trial.

8. Atlas: best for perm and search agencies that want an AI-first CRM

Verdict: Atlas is for agencies ready to replace their CRM with one built around AI memory.

Atlas calls itself "the all-in-one AI recruitment platform for enterprise agencies". Its CRM is called CRMx, which Atlas says "stands for Customer Relationship Management with conteXt". The idea is that "Atlas captures everything you say, hear, read, or write and instantly feeds it to your AI agents", across emails, calls, WhatsApp and meetings.

On that memory, Atlas agents tag candidates, send emails and write summaries, and the platform adds AI sourcing and a business development pipeline. For a perm or search consultant who sells to the client and delivers the candidates, one system for both sides is the draw.

The price of that is a migration. Adopting Atlas means moving your clients, candidates and history off your current ATS.

Best for: perm and search agencies that sell and deliver in one system and are open to changing CRM.

Watch out for: the 12-month commitment, and contact enrichment sits on the Premium tier.

Pricing model: per user per month on a 12-month commitment, with Basic and Premium tiers priced in pounds, dollars, euros and Australian dollars. Prices are on the website, with a 14-day free start.

9. Sense: best for staffing teams engaging workers by text, WhatsApp and voice

Verdict: Sense keeps a large temp workforce engaged and screened without a recruiter on every message.

Sense is an "AI-powered recruiting platform" that promises to "turn your ATS into an active talent engine". In its words, "Sense automatically screens, matches, and engages candidates across their favorite channels." Those channels are text, WhatsApp and a chatbot. Voice AI handles phone screens and reference checks, alongside matching, scheduling and a CRM that lives inside your ATS. Sense is also rolling out Sense AI Agents.

The strength is volume. A temp desk can send reminders, shift offers and quick screens to hundreds of workers from the ATS it already uses. In Bullhorn's GRID 2026 Talent Trends report (23 September 2026), which is Bullhorn's own research, 69 percent of candidates had met AI through their staffing firm. Of those, 81 percent rated it positively.

Sense works on people already in your ATS. It engages and screens them well, but it does not find someone new.

Best for: temp staffing firms with large active talent pools.

Watch out for: the value depends on clean, current data in your ATS, and enterprise staffing setups are quoted separately.

Pricing model: monthly platform tiers, including a Sense Platform for Staffing Teams with a published starting price. Enterprise Staffing is by quote.

10. ConverzAI: best for high-volume staffing firms screening applicants by voice

Verdict: ConverzAI puts a voice screen on every applicant and keeps the ATS updated without recruiter data entry.

ConverzAI's pitch is "Staffing recruits faster with ConverzAI", and it calls itself the "World's Leading Automation for Staffing Firms". Its Virtual Recruiter "works on autopilot", screening applicants by voice. It also searches the database to "find, match and reactivate" past candidates for new orders.

Its homepage asks you to "Imagine if your ATS could update itself!" ConverzAI writes screening results back into the ATS, so nobody types up the call.

Voice suits the roles ConverzAI targets. Bullhorn's Talent Trends report, again Bullhorn's own research, found that 92 percent of candidates interviewed by an AI voice agent rated it as good as or better than a live interview with a recruiter. ConverzAI's scope is applicants and your existing database; it does not source new people.

Best for: high-volume staffing firms with more applicants than recruiters can call back.

Watch out for: you need a demo to see a price, and its value grows with volume, so a small perm desk will see less of it.

Pricing model: custom quote through a demo. No price on the website.

11. Carv: best for enterprise volume staffing that wants a library of configurable agents

Verdict: Carv suits large staffing groups that want to build their own set of recruiting agents.

Carv's pitch is to "build, deploy and manage recruitment agents at scale", and it now calls itself an Autonomous Hiring Platform for volume hiring. Its staffing page calls Carv "the agentic execution layer powering the world's leading staffing agencies". The agent library covers hosting, screening, assessment, scheduling, reactivation, rediscovery, reassignment, talent-pool maintenance and compliance.

A temp business will notice reassignment first, because that agent is built to move a worker onto the next assignment when one ends. Carv connects to your ATS as the source of record. The catch is that configuring agents is a project, with discovery calls before anything runs.

Best for: enterprise staffing groups with high volume and an operations team to run agents.

Watch out for: a discovery-led sale, which is a long road for a small agency.

Pricing model: custom quote through a discovery call. No price on the website.

12. Popp: best for staffing firms that want screening and document collection inside their own systems

Verdict: Popp is the choice for staffing firms that want candidate conversations built into their own stack rather than another app.

Popp describes itself as "powering candidate conversations in staffing". It says "Popp's API-first conversation engine embeds into your existing systems". In Popp's words, it "screens with precision, requests and validates documents, answers candidate questions, and schedules your interviews".

Document collection sets Popp apart for compliance-heavy staffing. Right-to-work papers and other documents are requested and checked in the same conversation as the screen, so the candidate reaches the recruiter ready to place. The trade-off is that Popp is an engine, not an app: someone on your side has to wire it into the ATS and the candidate journey.

Best for: staffing firms with compliance checks on every placement and a team that can work with an API.

Watch out for: there is no self-serve start, and the setup assumes technical help.

Pricing model: quote after a demo; no public pricing page.

When should an agency not pick The Cognitive?

The Cognitive is built for sourcing-led recruiting, and that makes it the wrong first buy for some agencies. Pick something else when:

• You need a new agency ATS or CRM. The Cognitive does not hold client records, a business development pipeline, placements or invoices. Look at Atlas, SourceWhale's CRM or our agency software list.
• Your agency runs on Bullhorn and wants AI on the data it already holds. Bullhorn Amplify matches and screens inside Bullhorn.
• Your bottleneck is inbound applicants for shift work. Sense and ConverzAI screen by text and voice at volume, which suits candidates who apply from a phone.
• Your desk works by phone, text and WhatsApp. The Cognitive's outreach is email from your own mailbox, and SourceWhale puts a dialler and messaging in one place.
• You want ATS sync on the entry plan. ATS sync comes on Sourcing Max and Business, and on Interviews Pro, Max and Business.

To start, pick your hardest open req and run it through one tool for two weeks. If that req needs people outside your database, start a free trial of The Cognitive. Seven days free, no card: 100 sourcing credits and 2 AI interviews, enough to source a real role, reveal emails and interview your best two candidates. Start free with The Cognitive.

Sources

• Bullhorn, GRID 2026 Industry Trends report, press release "Bullhorn GRID Report: Staffing Firms Using AI See Stronger Growth, Faster Placements" (online survey of nearly 2,300 recruitment industry professionals, November to December 2025), 25 February 2026 (bullhorn.com). Bullhorn is a vendor on this list.
• Bullhorn, 2026 GRID Talent Trends report, press release "Bullhorn's 2026 GRID Talent Trends Report Finds 92 Percent of Candidates Rate AI Voice Interviews as Good as or Better than Human Interviews" (survey of nearly 2,300 people who worked with a staffing firm in the past three years), 23 September 2026 (bullhorn.com). Bullhorn is a vendor on this list.
• Gem, Key takeaways from the 2026 Recruiting Benchmarks Report, 1 December 2025.
• Ashby, Recruiter Productivity, 2026 Talent Trends Report, 28 April 2026.
• The Cognitive, UK staffing agency case study and healthcare staffing case study (customer-reported results).
• Pin, CEO post on Pin's LinkedIn update, 16 September 2026 (pin.com).
• Vendor pages:
  • Juicebox homepage and pricing page (juicebox.ai)
  • Pin agencies and pricing pages (pin.com)
  • hireEZ EZ Agent, staffing and pricing pages (hireez.com)
  • SourceWhale homepage (sourcewhale.com)
  • Bullhorn Amplify and pricing pages (bullhorn.com)
  • CoRecruit homepage, VoIP and pricing pages (corecruit.com)
  • Atlas homepage and pricing page (recruitwithatlas.com)
  • Sense homepage, staffing and pricing pages (sensehq.com)
  • ConverzAI homepage (converzai.com)
  • Carv homepage and staffing page (carv.com)
  • Popp homepage (joinpopp.com)

All posts · thecognitive.io