hireEZ vs Maki, finding more people or knowing more about them
hireEZ vs Maki splits on where your hiring is weakest. Pick hireEZ if you need more of the right people in the funnel, through sourcing, a CRM and outreach on top of your ATS. Pick Maki if applicants are plentiful and you need defensible evidence on each, from skills screens and voice interviews to scored human interviews.
hireEZ vs Maki, the short answer
- Both sell to enterprise teams and both sit on top of the ATS you keep
- hireEZ is strongest before the application: search, CRM, outreach
- Maki is strongest after it: skills screens, voice interviews, deep assessments
- Neither shows an enterprise price; Maki prices AI agents by candidate interaction
hireEZ vs Maki, side by side
Each cell paraphrases hireez.com or makipeople.com, read 5 October 2026.
| What you are comparing | hireEZ | Maki |
|---|---|---|
| Finding new people | A billion plus profiles across 45+ platforms, plus ATS rediscovery | Not offered; Maki starts at intake and screens the people you bring |
| AI voice screen | Phone screen with transcript, highlights and an integrity report | Mochi, on web or phone, scored against a fixed behavioural grid |
| Skills testing | Not described on the pages read | Shiro across 300+ skills; Ken assessments across 400+ skills |
| Human interviews | AI Scheduler books panels and reschedules inside your rules | Kumi schedules; Tomo joins Zoom, Teams or Meet to structure and score |
| Bias evidence | Assessments by Armilla AI and Warden AI, with three audit reports | Holistic AI audit under NYC Local Law 144 for Mochi |
| Security | SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 | ISO 27001, GDPR, EU AI Act ready, EU data residency by default |
| Pricing model | Seats plus configuration to the stack replaced; solo entry tier shown | Enterprise platform plus usage based credits per candidate interaction, by quote |
hireEZ shows a solo price; Maki shows none. No figure appears here.
Different halves of the same funnel
hireEZ spends most of its homepage on getting people in: sourcing on command, branded career pages, a CRM that keeps profiles warm, and applicant review that reads every application. Its one assessment like step is the AI phone screen.
Maki spends almost none of its words on finding people. Its five stages run from intake to a hire recommendation, and the middle three are all evidence: skills screening, voice screening, late stage assessments and a co pilot that turns each human interview into structured notes and scores. It sells defensibility to legal and compliance as much as speed.
One requisition, followed through both
- Intake Maki turns the job description into a structured hiring journey and says it builds the live pipeline in 30 minutes. hireEZ starts with a brief to EZ Agent for the search.
- Filling the top hireEZ sources, launches campaigns and reviews applicants. Maki waits for candidates to arrive through your ATS stage, then triggers its agents from there.
- Screening hireEZ calls each candidate for an AI phone screen. Maki can run Shiro's skills screen, Mochi's voice interview, or both, and ranks the results.
- Interview and decision hireEZ's AI Scheduler books the panel. Maki's Tomo sits in the human interview, then a decision card brings scorecard, risk flags and a recommendation with a confidence level.
Choose hireEZ if, choose Maki if
Do
- Your roles stall for lack of qualified applicants
- Recruiters spend their week searching and writing outreach
- You want one contract to replace sourcing, CRM and scheduling tools
- You hire cleared talent and want its defense focused sourcing
Do not
- You have more applicants than recruiters can fairly screen
- Legal needs a fixed scoring grid and a published bias audit for the voice screen
- Your interviewers need live structure and scoring in Zoom or Teams
- Candidate data has to stay in the EU by default
What procurement will ask both of them
Both are enterprise sales, so expect security and fairness questions before price.
- Which audit covers the exact feature we plan to switch on?
- Where is candidate data hosted, and can we choose the region?
- Which ATS fields does each agent write back?
- Can a human overrule every AI recommendation, and is it logged?
- How are credits or seats counted when volume spikes?
- What does the pilot or verification period include?
Using both
The two overlap only at the voice screen. A team could source in hireEZ and send people to Maki's assessments from the ATS stage, since Maki lists native SAP, iCIMS and Workday links. Pick one voice screen per role.
Search and a live interview without an enterprise rollout
A fixed rubric per role, with questions that adapt live to each answer.
For teams that want both halves without two enterprise contracts, The Cognitive searches ~900M public profiles with verified emails and phones, then runs a live AI video interview of 10 or 20 minutes. Each criterion is scored 1 to 5 with overall written feedback, a transcript and the recording, and 60+ ATS get a note. [Start free](https://app.thecognitive.io/signup).
Keep reading
Maki review · hireEZ review · Maki alternatives · hireEZ alternatives · Apriora vs Maki
Frequently asked questions
Is Maki better than hireEZ?
They are strong in different places. Maki is better when you need evidence on candidates you already have: skills screens, a scored voice interview, deep assessments and structured human interviews. hireEZ is better when you need more candidates, through sourcing across 45+ platforms, a CRM and outreach. Many enterprise teams need one more than the other.
Does Maki source candidates like hireEZ?
Not on the pages read 5 October 2026. Maki's five stages begin at intake, where it says it defines success before sourcing, and its agents run on candidates who reach a stage in your ATS. hireEZ searches the open web and partner networks for people who have not applied.
hireEZ vs Maki pricing: how do they charge?
Maki combines an enterprise platform with usage based pricing for its AI agents: each runs on credits per candidate interaction, quoted for your organization. hireEZ shows a starting price for solo recruiters and configures enterprise pricing to the tools it replaces, with seats still part of the model. Neither publishes an enterprise figure.
How do hireEZ's and Maki's voice screens differ?
hireEZ's AI phone screen returns a transcript, response highlights, summarized signals and an integrity report that flags AI assisted answers. Maki's Mochi runs on web or phone, leads the agenda, probes vague answers and scores against a fixed behavioural grid, with callbacks and SMS follow ups when candidates drop off.
Which ATS do hireEZ and Maki work with?
hireEZ says it has 40+ native ATS integrations. Maki says it connects with 30+ ATS and HR systems, featuring native SAP and Workday integrations and an official iCIMS partnership. Both describe themselves as running on top of the ATS you already have.
Are hireEZ and Maki bias audited?
Both point to outside reviewers. hireEZ's AI values page cites independent bias assessments by Armilla AI and Warden AI, with separate reports for sourcing, applicant matching and AI screening. Maki says Mochi was audited by Holistic AI under NYC Local Law 144 across gender and race or ethnicity, and links the signed reports. Ask each for the report on the feature you will use.
Can I use hireEZ and Maki together?
Yes, with care. The natural split is hireEZ for sourcing and nurture, Maki for assessments and interview structure. Both offer an AI voice screen, so choose one per role to avoid asking candidates for two AI conversations.
Explore: Maki review · hireEZ review · Maki alternatives · hireEZ alternatives · Apriora vs Maki