Maki vs Jack and Jill, screening the pile or skipping it
Maki vs Jack and Jill is a choice between two opposite fixes. Maki suits large employers drowning in applications, screening each one by AI voice call and skills test inside the ATS. Jack and Jill suits Seed to Series C startups that want warm introductions to people who never applied, paying a fee only on a hire.
Two different answers to too many applicants
Inbound screening vs introductions Maki keeps the application funnel and puts AI agents on every stage of it. Jack and Jill steps around the funnel: its candidate agent, Jack, talks to professionals, and Jill introduces the ones who opt in.
A Maki customer sees ranked, scored applicants in its ATS. A Jill customer sees a short list of people from Jack's network and asks for introductions.
Maki vs Jack and Jill, feature by feature
Taken from each company's own pages on 5 October 2026.
| Area | Maki | Jack and Jill |
|---|---|---|
| Typical customer | Enterprises, with use cases for frontline, early talent, specialists and staffing | Young companies from Seed to Series C, hiring in London, New York or San Francisco |
| Where candidates come from | Your own applicants, picked up at an ATS stage | Over 400,000 people who talked to Jack and chose to be introduced |
| What the AI does | Voice screens, skills tests, deep assessments, scheduling and an interview co-pilot | Sharpens the brief, writes a rubric, maps the market, shortlists and arranges warm intros |
| Interview by AI | Mochi runs an adaptive voice screen scored on a fixed grid | None for your candidates described; Jack's mock interviews are practice for job seekers |
| Roles covered | Any volume role, from frontline to specialist | Engineering, product, design, marketing, sales, operations and leadership |
| ATS | 30+ ATS and HR connections; SAP, iCIMS and Workday are its featured partners | Two-way Ashby sync, a custom ATS route, and Slack |
| Bias review | Holistic AI audits under NYC Local Law 144 for Mochi | Assured by Warden AI, plus a published guide to bias in AI hiring |
What you are actually buying
With Maki you buy throughput and evidence. Mochi replaces the recruiter phone screen, Shiro tests skills, Ken handles high stakes assessments, Kumi books the human interview and Tomo takes structured notes during it. At the end each candidate has one decision card with a scorecard, risk flags and a hire recommendation with a confidence level.
With Jill you buy access. Jack speaks to hundreds of people a day about what they want next, and Jill matches your brief against that network and only introduces people interested in what you are building. Jill's page says it replaces the agency recruiter and LinkedIn sourcing sessions. You still run your own interviews.
Choose Maki if, choose Jack and Jill if
Do
- You already receive more applications than recruiters can phone screen.
- Compliance needs audited, explainable scoring and EU data residency.
- You hire across regions and languages and want one consistent grid.
- Your ATS is SAP, iCIMS or Workday and results must flow back into it.
Do not
- You are a startup making a few critical hires and inbound is weak.
- You want people who are not job hunting, introduced warmly rather than cold messaged.
- You would rather pay on a hire than sign a platform contract.
- You hire in London, San Francisco or New York in its listed functions.
A week with each, day to day
On Maki, a recruiter's week barely changes shape. Candidates reach a stage, Maki invites them, progress shows in the ATS, and those over your threshold advance. The work moves from phone screens to reviewing decision cards and joining later interviews with Tomo listening in.
On Jill, a founder writes a brief from notes or a conversation, refines it as Jill calibrates against real profiles, and gives feedback in Slack. Introductions then land as meetings. The week is spent talking to a handful of people rather than reading applications, and Jill learns from every yes and no.
Maki vs Jack and Jill pricing
Jack and Jill states its fee publicly; Maki quotes. The models only:
| Term | Maki | Jack and Jill |
|---|---|---|
| What you pay for | Credits per AI agent for candidate interactions | A success fee as a percentage of first-year salary, only on a hire |
| Upfront cost | A quoted platform agreement | None: no subscriptions, retainers or upfront fees |
| Refunds | Not described | Full refund if a hire leaves or is dismissed in the first 3 months |
| Edge cases | Not described | No fee for someone you already talk to; contractors priced on 12 months' pay |
Jack and Jill's llms.txt says refund and contractor terms sit in the commercial agreement.
When you want to search and interview yourself
A shortlist built from a search, ready to invite to an AI interview.
The Cognitive covers ground between these two. You search ~900M public profiles from a plain English brief and reveal verified emails and phones, then invite people to a live AI video interview of 10 or 20 minutes. Each report has 1 to 5 scores per criterion, overall written feedback, a transcript and a recording.
Next reads
Maki review · Jack and Jill review · Jack and Jill alternatives · Maki alternatives · Juicebox vs Jack and Jill
Frequently asked questions
Is Jack and Jill better than Maki?
Neither is better across the board, because they solve different problems. Maki is better when you have plenty of applicants and need them screened consistently. Jack and Jill is better when good people are not applying and you want warm introductions instead.
Maki vs Jack and Jill pricing: what is the model?
Jack and Jill charges companies a success fee, a percentage of first-year salary, only when Jill makes a hire, with no subscription or upfront fee. Maki uses usage based credits per AI agent and gives a personalised quote. Maki publishes no price.
Does Jack and Jill interview candidates with AI?
Jack talks with every candidate about their goals and runs mock interviews for job seekers, but its pages do not describe a scored AI screening interview for companies. Jill shortlists and introduces; your team runs the interviews. Maki's Mochi is a scored AI voice screen.
Can I use Maki and Jack and Jill together?
Yes, in principle, since they cover different steps. Jill could introduce senior or hard to find hires while Maki screens high volume inbound roles. Check how each writes to your ATS: Jack and Jill documents Ashby and a custom route, Maki lists 30+ systems.
Who are Jack and Jill's candidates?
People who have spoken to Jack, its free AI career agent, and opted in to introductions. Its llms.txt says Jill never cold messages strangers. The network covers engineering, product, design, marketing, sales, operations and leadership, mainly in London, San Francisco and New York.
Is Maki only for large companies?
Maki brands itself AI hiring for enterprise, with dedicated sandbox environments, a customer success manager and a rollout of under 2 months. Its customer stories include Nespresso and Forvis Mazars. A small startup would find its onboarding heavy for a few hires.
Explore: Maki review · Jack and Jill review · Elly vs Jack and Jill · Juicebox vs Maki