Maki vs InterviewFlowAI: Which Fits Your Hiring Stack?
Maki and InterviewFlowAI are built to do different things. Maki positions itself as hiring intelligence end to end (AI agents, assessments; EU/GDPR angle). InterviewFlowAI positions itself as AI interview software with published per-interview pricing. The practical difference shows up in four places: whether the tool sources candidates, what an interview actually looks like, what evidence sits behind a score, and whether pricing is published. Each section below is drawn from what the two companies state publicly. The Cognitive publishes this comparison and competes with both.
Maki vs InterviewFlowAI at a glance
| Maki | InterviewFlowAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Sourcing | Not offered | Not offered |
| Interview format | Structured tests and assessments | AI interviews |
| Evidence behind a score | Test scores | Interview output |
| Pricing visibility | Published, EU/GDPR positioned | Published per interview |
Where Maki is strong
- Large skills-test library (150+) and science-based assessment approach
- Strong European/GDPR compliance story and enterprise deployments
Where InterviewFlowAI is strong
- Published, self-serve pricing with no sales call to see a number
- Large programmatic library of role interview pages
Does Maki or InterviewFlowAI source candidates?
| Half of the pipeline | What it has to deliver | Maki | InterviewFlowAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sourcing (outbound) | Candidates who have not applied, with contact details that resolve | Not offered | Not offered |
| Screening (evaluation) | A judgement about ability, with evidence behind it | Structured tests and assessments | AI interviews |
| Evidence | Something a rejected candidate or an auditor can be shown | Test scores | Interview output |
| Cost visibility | A number you can size before a sales call | Published, EU/GDPR positioned | Published per interview |
Candidate sourcing is the outbound half of recruitment: searching for people who have not applied, checking them against the role, revealing contact details and opening the first conversation. Screening is the half after that — deciding which of the people in front of you is worth a hiring manager's hour. Tools in this category tend to be built for one half or the other, and a shortlist that mixes them up buys the same half twice.
Maki's published position on sourcing is: Not offered. InterviewFlowAI's is: Not offered. On the interview side, Maki states: Structured tests and assessments; InterviewFlowAI states: AI interviews. Where a row reads "not stated publicly", treat it as an absence of a public claim rather than as evidence the capability is missing — ask in the demo.
Choosing between them
- Pick Maki if your bottleneck matches its strength: Large skills-test library (150+) and science-based assessment approach
- Pick InterviewFlowAI if your bottleneck matches its strength: Published, self-serve pricing with no sales call to see a number
- If pricing visibility matters to your process, compare the two rows above before booking either demo — one of these vendors publishes a number and the other may not.
- Neither choice is permanent. The row that usually decides it is "evidence behind a score", because that is the one your hiring managers argue about 6 months in.
A third option: cover sourcing and interviewing in one pipeline
Most shortlists that include Maki and InterviewFlowAI are really choosing between two halves of the same problem — finding candidates and evaluating them. The Cognitive covers both: candidate sourcing across ~900M profiles with contact details enriched from 30+ sources, then a live, two-way AI video interview with a real face and voice. Every rating on the scorecard ties back to a quote and a timestamp, and it works inside the ATS you already run rather than replacing it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Maki and InterviewFlowAI?
Maki is hiring intelligence end to end (AI agents, assessments; EU/GDPR angle). InterviewFlowAI is AI interview software with published per-interview pricing.
Does Maki or InterviewFlowAI include candidate sourcing?
Maki: Not offered. InterviewFlowAI: Not offered.
Which one publishes pricing?
Maki: Published, EU/GDPR positioned. InterviewFlowAI: Published per interview.
Other comparisons
Maki review · InterviewFlowAI review · Maki alternatives · InterviewFlowAI alternatives · Eightfold AI vs Maki · HireVue vs Maki · AI Recruiting Software Guide · Deep AI Interviews · Pricing