Maki vs InterviewFlowAI, an enterprise rollout or a trial today
Maki vs InterviewFlowAI turns on how you buy. Maki suits large employers that need audited voice screening and deep assessments wired into SAP, iCIMS or Workday, sold by quote. InterviewFlowAI suits smaller teams and agencies that want phone and video AI interviews on a published monthly credit plan, starting with a trial.
Maki vs InterviewFlowAI, compared row by row
Every cell comes from the vendor's own pages, read on 5 October 2026.
| Area | Maki | InterviewFlowAI |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Enterprise hiring: frontline, early talent, specialists and staffing firms | High volume, global, agency and startup hiring, with plans from a single role upward |
| AI interview channel | Mochi voice screen by web call, or by phone | Two-way AI interviews by video or phone, taken on the candidate's schedule |
| Languages | 45+ for Mochi, per the Maki homepage | 16, with 10 voices and an AI avatar |
| Assessments | Shiro across 300+ skills and Ken across 400+ for late funnel roles | 100+ assessments with pass scores that move candidates on to the AI interview |
| Human interviews | Tomo co-pilot on Zoom, Teams or Meet, guiding the interviewer live | AI Notetaker that records recruiter calls with consent and writes a report |
| Sourcing | None described; agents start from an ATS stage | Talent Search and outreach on paid plans above the entry tier |
| Integrity | Proctoring, every score traced to evidence, published Holistic AI bias audits | Tab switch, copy paste, LLM use and face direction tracking into a trust score |
The quick read
- Both run AI screening by phone, and both adapt follow-up questions to what the candidate says.
- Maki is an enterprise programme: contract, privacy review, branding and rollout in under 2 months.
- InterviewFlowAI is self serve: pick a plan, paste a job description and invite candidates the same day.
- Maki adds deep assessments and an interview co-pilot; InterviewFlowAI adds talent search and an MCP connector.
Mochi and InterviewFlowAI's interviewer, compared
Mochi is designed to replace the recruiter phone screen. Maki describes 4 separate components that speak, steer, extract evidence and score, with scoring against a fixed behaviourally anchored grid. It checks eligibility, motivation, availability and language, answers candidate questions from approved documents, and follows up by callback or SMS when a candidate drops off.
InterviewFlowAI turns a pasted job description into questions and criteria you can edit, then runs the interview by video or phone. Its demo shows must-haves being checked live and an adaptive follow-up generated from the last answer. Afterwards comes a scorecard with a transcript, competency breakdown, ranking and integrity score, plus the recording.
What getting started looks like
The two onboarding paths, as each vendor describes them.
- Maki: setup and legal Contracting, a data privacy review and integration scoping come first, backed by a data processing agreement.
- Maki: branding, training, launch Workflow and branding are configured, admins and recruiters are trained, and a pilot is validated before go-live, in under 2 months.
- InterviewFlowAI: trial A business email starts a 7 day trial of Pilot, Growth or Scale with 10 credits and that plan's full features.
- InterviewFlowAI: invite Invite candidates by link, CSV or a connected ATS, then review ranked shortlists in one dashboard. ATS integrations are listed from the Growth plan; the entry plan works by link or CSV.
Choose Maki if, choose InterviewFlowAI if
You run an enterprise funnel on SAP, iCIMS or Workday and need results written back with auto-progression.
Maki. Its integrations push progress, scores and proctoring data into the ATS as candidates go.
Which of the 5 agents the first phase switches on.
Your legal team will ask about NYC Local Law 144 and the EU AI Act before launch.
Maki. It publishes signed bias audit reports for Mochi and states EU data residency by default.
Audit scope for any agent beyond Mochi.
An agency or a 50 person company wants AI screening running this week without procurement.
InterviewFlowAI. Monthly plans, a 7 day trial and no setup fee.
Whether phone interviews are on the plan you pick, since the entry plan is video only.
You also need to find candidates, not only screen applicants.
InterviewFlowAI. Talent Search and automated outreach sit in the same workspace.
How many credits a search uses on your plan.
Maki vs InterviewFlowAI pricing
InterviewFlowAI publishes its plan prices; Maki does not. The models, side by side:
| Term | Maki | InterviewFlowAI |
|---|---|---|
| Unit you pay for | Credits per AI agent, tied to candidate interactions, not licences | Monthly interview credits per plan; one interview uses one credit |
| Seats | Not licence based | Not seat based, so stakeholders are added freely |
| Published price | No, a personalised quote | Yes, for 3 plans; Enterprise is custom |
| Unused volume | Not described | Credits roll over on Growth and Scale, not on Pilot |
| Assessments | Shiro and Ken run on credits | Each assessment uses half a credit |
If you need people found as well as interviewed
A role described in plain English becoming search filters you can edit.
The Cognitive pairs search with a live interview. A plain English brief searches ~900M public profiles and reveals verified emails and phones, and candidates book a live AI video interview of 10 or 20 minutes. Reports carry 1 to 5 scores per criterion, overall written feedback, a transcript and a recording.
Further reading
Maki review · InterviewFlowAI review · Maki alternatives · InterviewFlowAI alternatives · HireVue vs Maki
Frequently asked questions
Is InterviewFlowAI better than Maki?
For a small team or agency that wants AI phone and video interviews running today on a monthly plan, InterviewFlowAI fits better. For an enterprise that needs audited screening, deep assessments and tight ATS write-back across regions, Maki fits better.
Maki vs InterviewFlowAI pricing: how do they compare?
InterviewFlowAI publishes monthly plans built on interview credits, with yearly billing and a custom Enterprise tier. Maki publishes no price and charges usage based credits per AI agent for candidate interactions, quoted per customer. Neither charges by recruiter seat.
Do Maki and InterviewFlowAI both do phone interviews?
Yes. Maki's Mochi runs by web call, its default, or by phone. InterviewFlowAI runs two-way AI interviews by video or phone, though its pricing table lists phone interviews from the Growth plan rather than the entry Pilot plan.
Which works with my ATS?
Maki lists 30+ ATS and HR systems, featuring SAP's talent suite, iCIMS and Workday, with results and auto-progression flowing back. InterviewFlowAI connects ATS, HRIS and calendar tools from its Growth plan and says it adds integrations monthly.
Can Maki or InterviewFlowAI detect cheating?
InterviewFlowAI tracks LLM use, tab switches, copy paste and eye and face direction, then gives each candidate a trust score. Maki lists proctoring among its products and sends proctoring data back to the ATS with results.
Does either tool source candidates?
InterviewFlowAI has Talent Search and automated outreach on its paid plans above Pilot. Maki's pages describe no sourcing: its stages start at intake and its agents are triggered from candidates already in your ATS.
Is there a free trial of Maki or InterviewFlowAI?
InterviewFlowAI offers a 7 day trial with 10 credits on Pilot, Growth or Scale for business email users. Maki's site offers a demo, a try it now link on the Mochi page and a personalised quote, and describes no self serve trial plan.
Explore: Maki review · InterviewFlowAI review · Apriora (now Alex) vs InterviewFlowAI · Gem vs Maki