Metaview vs Truffle for screening a pile of applicants
Metaview vs Truffle splits on the shape of the screen. Truffle suits a small team that wants resumes, one way video answers and assessments scored in one ranked list, billed by usage. Metaview suits a recruiting team that wants a two way voice screen with follow ups, plus notes on the interviews people run later.
Metaview vs Truffle, side by side
Each cell is based on the vendor's own pages, read on 5 October 2026. Both publish prices; the figures are left out so the table stays accurate when they change.
| What you are comparing | Metaview | Truffle |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Recruiters, hiring managers, agencies and large employers | Small teams doing high volume hiring |
| Screening format | Two way voice conversation with follow up questions | One way recorded video answers, on the candidate's own time |
| Other screening signals | Role plays and code shown on screen for the candidate to explain | AI resume screening plus 3 talent assessments, mixed per role |
| After the first screen | A notetaker for later video, phone and in person interviews | Not covered; Truffle stops at the screening stage |
| ATS links | A long list, with notes and decisions synced to the record | Native Ashby, Breezy HR and Indeed; others by connector or Zapier |
| How the bill grows | Per user, per agent you switch on | Per screening, from a monthly credit pool; unlimited users |
| Trial | A free plan | A 7 day trial with a small credit allowance and no card |
Read on metaview.ai and hiretruffle.com on 5 October 2026. Recheck both pricing pages before you commit.
One way or two way, and why it matters
Truffle's interview is one way: the candidate sees your questions, records answers whenever suits them, and Truffle scores each answer against your criteria. Nobody asks a second question. That keeps setup short and lets a candidate finish on a phone in a lunch break.
Metaview's screen is a conversation. A voice agent asks a question, listens, and follows up on what was said before moving on. You get more depth per candidate, and the candidate spends longer talking to a machine that reacts.
Choose Metaview if, choose Truffle if
Here are 5 common hiring situations and which product each vendor's own pages point toward.
A 6 person ops team hires 40 store staff a season and has no recruiter.
Truffle. It is self serve, has unlimited team members, and lets you post a position link to Indeed, LinkedIn or a careers page with no ATS.
Count your monthly screens against the credit pool before picking a plan.
You want to hear an SDR handle an objection, not read a polished answer.
Metaview. Its agent plays a character and responds to what the candidate says.
Truffle's one way format cannot react to an answer.
Personality fit and job skills matter as much as experience for this role.
Truffle. All 3 talent assessments are included on every plan and show next to the resume and interview.
Metaview's pages describe no assessment library.
Your later rounds are run by busy hiring managers whose notes arrive late.
Metaview's notetaker, which posts notes and scorecards to the candidate's ATS record.
Truffle covers screening only.
A staffing desk works high req loads in Bullhorn.
Either. Both list Bullhorn. Truffle frames it for staffing desks; Metaview syncs notes to the record.
Ask each exactly which fields write back to Bullhorn.
Setting up one screening role in each
Both vendors say you can be running the same day. These are the steps each one describes.
- Truffle: create the position Name the role, set must haves and pick which signals to screen on: resume, one way interview, assessment or any mix. Pasting a job description fills in a starting point.
- Truffle: bring candidates in Share the position link, import resumes, or connect an ATS. Truffle then ranks every applicant with the reasoning attached, and you advance, hold or reject.
- Metaview: build the call Create questions from a job post or an old screening call, set the rubric, and preview the whole call before a candidate hears it.
- Metaview: send and review Link the screen to an ATS stage or send the link. Each call is recorded, transcribed and scored, possible fraud is flagged, and a person decides.
What to test in each trial
Both trials are free, so run them side by side on one open role. These checks show the differences that matter.
- How many of 10 invited candidates finish the screen
- Whether follow up questions find anything the first answer hid
- How long it takes you to review one candidate properly
- What lands in your ATS and on which stage
- What a full month of your real volume would cost
- How each handles a candidate reading answers from a script
Metaview vs Truffle at a glance
- Truffle is one way video, resumes and assessments in one ranked list
- Metaview is a two way voice screen plus notes for later interviews
- Truffle bills by screening with unlimited users; Metaview bills per user
- Both let you start without a sales call
A two way interview, on camera
The AI asks a follow up built from the candidate's last answer, while the rubric for the role stays fixed.
Truffle is one way video and Metaview is two way voice. If you want both together, two way and on video, The Cognitive runs a live AI interview of 10 or 20 minutes at a slot the candidate books, then gives a 1 to 5 score per criterion, overall written feedback, the transcript and the recording.
Keep reading
Metaview review · Metaview alternatives · Truffle review · Truffle alternatives
How this was checked
Metaview facts come from metaview.ai and Truffle facts from hiretruffle.com, read on 5 October 2026. Both publish prices; neither set is repeated here.
Frequently asked questions
Is Metaview better than Truffle?
For different teams. Truffle suits a small team that wants resumes, one way video answers and assessments scored together, with no per seat fee. Metaview suits a recruiting team that wants a two way voice screen with follow ups, plus a notetaker for the interviews people run later. Run one role through both free trials before deciding.
Metaview vs Truffle pricing: how does each charge?
Truffle uses a monthly credit pool: a scored resume, an assessed candidate and a completed one way interview each use a set number of credits, with unlimited users and positions. Metaview charges per user per month for each agent, with a free plan, and quotes enterprise. The exact rates sit on each vendor's own pricing page.
Is Truffle a one way video interview tool?
Yes, for its interview part. Candidates record answers to your questions on their own time, on any device, and Truffle scores each answer against your criteria, with a full transcript and video key moments it calls Candidate Shorts. It also screens resumes and runs talent assessments, and you can combine all three per role.
Does Metaview's screening agent ask follow up questions?
Yes. Metaview describes a voice agent that adapts to the candidate's responses, asks follow ups about past contributions and decisions, and answers the candidate's own questions. It can also run role plays and show code for the candidate to explain aloud. Each call is recorded, transcribed and scored.
Does Truffle integrate with Greenhouse or Lever?
Through Zapier, according to Truffle's integrations page, which names Greenhouse and Lever among the systems it reaches that way. Its native connectors are Ashby, Breezy HR and Indeed. Metaview lists Greenhouse and Lever directly and maps interview answers into their scorecards.
Can I use Truffle without an ATS?
Yes. Truffle says it works on its own: each position gets a link you can share by email, post on job boards or add to your careers page. Metaview's screening can also be sent by link to each candidate, though most of its value comes from syncing to an ATS.
Can I use Metaview and Truffle together?
You could use Truffle for the first screen of a high volume role and Metaview's notetaker for the interviews your team runs afterwards. Both connect to Ashby and Bullhorn, among others. Running both screening products at once would mostly duplicate cost.
Explore: Metaview review · Metaview alternatives · Truffle review · Truffle alternatives