SeekOut vs Maki: Which Fits Your Hiring Stack?
SeekOut and Maki are built to do different things. SeekOut positions itself as agentic AI recruiting platform - source, screen & engage. Maki positions itself as hiring intelligence end to end (AI agents, assessments; EU/GDPR angle). The practical difference shows up in four places: whether the tool sources candidates, what an interview actually looks like, what evidence sits behind a score, and whether pricing is published. Each section below is drawn from what the two companies state publicly. The Cognitive publishes this comparison and competes with both.
SeekOut vs Maki at a glance
| SeekOut | Maki | |
|---|---|---|
| Sourcing | Included — source, screen and engage | Not offered |
| Interview format | Not offered; the chain stops at engage | Structured tests and assessments |
| Evidence behind a score | Screening and talent-search signals | Test scores |
| Pricing visibility | Enterprise seat-priced | Published, EU/GDPR positioned |
Where SeekOut is strong
- Deep talent-search database with strong diversity sourcing and technical-talent filters
- Enterprise talent analytics and an early MCP integration
- Verb-chain positioning (source, screen, engage) with mature enterprise sales motion
Where Maki is strong
- Large skills-test library (150+) and science-based assessment approach
- Strong European/GDPR compliance story and enterprise deployments
Does SeekOut or Maki source candidates?
| Half of the pipeline | What it has to deliver | SeekOut | Maki |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sourcing (outbound) | Candidates who have not applied, with contact details that resolve | Included — source, screen and engage | Not offered |
| Screening (evaluation) | A judgement about ability, with evidence behind it | Not offered; the chain stops at engage | Structured tests and assessments |
| Evidence | Something a rejected candidate or an auditor can be shown | Screening and talent-search signals | Test scores |
| Cost visibility | A number you can size before a sales call | Enterprise seat-priced | Published, EU/GDPR positioned |
Candidate sourcing is the outbound half of recruitment: searching for people who have not applied, checking them against the role, revealing contact details and opening the first conversation. Screening is the half after that — deciding which of the people in front of you is worth a hiring manager's hour. Tools in this category tend to be built for one half or the other, and a shortlist that mixes them up buys the same half twice.
SeekOut's published position on sourcing is: Included — source, screen and engage. Maki's is: Not offered. On the interview side, SeekOut states: Not offered; the chain stops at engage; Maki states: Structured tests and assessments. Where a row reads "not stated publicly", treat it as an absence of a public claim rather than as evidence the capability is missing — ask in the demo.
Choosing between them
- Pick SeekOut if your bottleneck matches its strength: Deep talent-search database with strong diversity sourcing and technical-talent filters
- Pick Maki if your bottleneck matches its strength: Large skills-test library (150+) and science-based assessment approach
- If pricing visibility matters to your process, compare the two rows above before booking either demo — one of these vendors publishes a number and the other may not.
- Neither choice is permanent. The row that usually decides it is "evidence behind a score", because that is the one your hiring managers argue about 6 months in.
A third option: cover sourcing and interviewing in one pipeline
Most shortlists that include SeekOut and Maki are really choosing between two halves of the same problem — finding candidates and evaluating them. The Cognitive covers both: candidate sourcing across ~900M profiles with contact details enriched from 30+ sources, then a live, two-way AI video interview with a real face and voice. Every rating on the scorecard ties back to a quote and a timestamp, and it works inside the ATS you already run rather than replacing it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between SeekOut and Maki?
SeekOut is agentic AI recruiting platform - source, screen & engage. Maki is hiring intelligence end to end (AI agents, assessments; EU/GDPR angle).
Does SeekOut or Maki include candidate sourcing?
SeekOut: Included — source, screen and engage. Maki: Not offered.
Which one publishes pricing?
SeekOut: Enterprise seat-priced. Maki: Published, EU/GDPR positioned.
Other comparisons
SeekOut review · Maki review · SeekOut alternatives · Maki alternatives · Eightfold AI vs SeekOut · HireVue vs SeekOut · AI Recruiting Software Guide · AI Sourcing Tool · Pricing