SeekOut vs Truffle for finding people or sorting applicants
In SeekOut vs Truffle, pick SeekOut when your problem is reaching people who never applied, at enterprise scale, with AI screening as an add-on. Pick Truffle when a small team is buried in applicants and needs resumes, one-way interviews and assessments scored fast, on a published credit plan. Some teams run both.
SeekOut vs Truffle, side by side
Each row is drawn from the vendor's own pages, read on 5 October 2026.
| What you are comparing | SeekOut | Truffle |
|---|---|---|
| Where candidates come from | 1B+ external profiles plus your ATS, then applicants once screening is added | Your applicants only: a job link, imported resumes, Indeed or your ATS |
| Written for | Enterprise recruiting teams; it says 750+ trust it | Lean teams doing high volume hiring, from founders to agencies |
| Screening methods | Inbound evaluation against a rubric, plus AI video interviews | Resume scoring, one-way video or audio interviews, and 3 talent assessments |
| Outreach | AI drafted, multi touch campaigns to passive candidates | None described; candidates arrive by applying |
| ATS connections | Workday, Greenhouse, iCIMS, Lever, SmartRecruiters, Ashby and more | Native Ashby, Breezy HR and Indeed; others through Zapier or its API |
| How you start | 14 day trial of Sourcing Core, no card | 7 day trial with 30 credits, no card |
| Pricing model | Per seat; one entry price shown, team plans billed annually | A monthly credit pool; every plan price published |
No price figure appears here. Both vendors publish some; read them on their own pricing pages.
They start at opposite ends of the funnel
SeekOut was built to find people. Its core is a search across 1B+ profiles and your ATS, with over 300 Power Filters for skills, licences and inferred security clearance. Inbound Evaluation and AI Screening came later, and its pricing page sells them as an add-on below the top plan.
Truffle never leaves your applicant pool. Its homepage says you decide what each role is screened on, resume criteria, one-way interview questions, assessments or any mix, and Truffle ranks every applicant with the evidence shown. If nobody suitable applied, Truffle has nothing to rank. If too many applied, that is exactly its job.
Choose SeekOut if, choose Truffle if
Your hard roles get few or no good applicants, and you need to go and find people.
SeekOut searches outside your applicant pool and drafts personalised outreach. Truffle describes no outbound search.
Which filters, such as clearance or diversity, are on the plan you are quoted.
You want past applicants and silver medalists in your ATS searched beside new names.
SeekOut's Sourcing plus Integration plan unifies the 1B+ search with your ATS for rediscovery.
Whether sync with your ATS is two way on your system.
A small team posts frontline or intern roles and gets hundreds of applicants a week.
Truffle scores every resume, collects one-way answers on the candidate's own time and returns a ranked shortlist with reasoning.
How many credits a typical role takes; its FAQ suggests a range.
You want to see the full price and start without a sales call.
Truffle publishes every plan price, offers a 7 day trial and says you can skip the sales call.
Whether the entry plan's hard cap suits a busy month.
You hire without an ATS and need a link to share.
Truffle works standalone. Each position gets a unique link to share on job boards or your careers page.
How you will export results if you later adopt an ATS.
How each one screens an applicant
Both now screen. They describe the work differently, and the format of the interview matters for candidates.
| Screening detail | SeekOut | Truffle |
|---|---|---|
| Resume review | Inbound Evaluation scores every applicant against your role rubric | AI Match scores each resume against your intake criteria |
| Interview format | AI video interviews; its pages do not say whether live or on the candidate's own time | One-way video or audio, taken on the candidate's own time |
| What you get back | Transcripts and evidence, with human in the loop validation | Scores, summaries, full transcripts and a feature it calls Candidate Shorts |
| Assessments | Not described on the pages read | 3 talent assessments, all included |
| Plan placement | Add-on for Team and Enterprise; included in Full Recruiting Funnel | Every method on every plan |
Read on seekout.com and hiretruffle.com on 5 October 2026.
What the work feels like in each tool
A SeekOut user spends the day in search: shaping criteria, reading ranked profiles with reasons, approving outreach drafts and checking replies. It also runs inside Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini and Amazon Quick through SeekOut MCP, so some of that happens in a chat window instead.
A Truffle user spends the day in a ranked list. Applicants answer on their own time, credits are spent only when a screening returns a result, and the recruiter opens the top of the list, reads the summary and transcript and decides who moves. There is no search box for strangers, by design.
Running both on one role through Ashby
SeekOut lists Ashby as a partner and Truffle connects to it natively. A team on Ashby could split the work like this.
- Source in SeekOut Search outside profiles and Ashby history together, then send campaigns to the passive people who fit.
- Collect applications in Ashby Replies and inbound applicants land in Ashby as candidates on the role.
- Trigger Truffle from a stage Truffle says moving a candidate to a chosen Ashby stage sends its screening invite automatically.
- Read results where you decide Match scores, summaries and assessment results are pushed back into the Ashby candidate profile.
SeekOut vs Truffle pricing, explained by model
SeekOut prices seats. Sourcing Core shows a figure and can be billed monthly or annually; the Sourcing, Sourcing plus Integration and Full Recruiting Funnel plans are billed annually, with per seat pricing that adjusts with volume and packages tailored to team size. Screening is extra below the top plan.
Truffle prices screenings. Each plan is a monthly credit pool: a scored resume costs 1 credit, an assessed candidate 2 and a completed one-way interview 5. Unused credits roll over on the larger plans, extra credits are billed at a flat rate, and the entry plan is a hard cap.
Before you commit to either
Do
- Count where last quarter's hires came from: outbound search or your own applicants
- Estimate monthly applicants per role before choosing a Truffle credit pool
- Ask SeekOut whether its screening interview is live or asynchronous
- Trial each on a real open role, since both offer a free start
Do not
- Buying an outbound sourcing seat to fix a pile of unread applications
- Expecting Truffle to find people who never applied to your job
- Comparing a seat price with a credit price without converting to cost per role
SeekOut vs Truffle in 4 lines
- SeekOut goes outbound across 1B+ profiles and your ATS; Truffle works only on people who applied
- SeekOut sells to enterprises by seat; Truffle sells to lean teams by credit pool
- Truffle's interviews are one-way; SeekOut's pages do not name the format
- Both connect to Ashby, so they can share a role rather than compete
Sourcing and a live interview in one place
The interviewer follows up when an answer is thin, while the rubric stays fixed for the role.
If you want outbound search and a two way interview without two contracts, The Cognitive searches ~900M public profiles, reveals verified emails and phones, and runs live AI video interviews of 10 or 20 minutes at a slot the candidate books. Each report gives a 1 to 5 score per criterion, overall written feedback, a transcript and a recording.
Keep reading
SeekOut review · SeekOut alternatives · Truffle review · Truffle alternatives · HireVue vs Truffle · HireVue vs SeekOut
Frequently asked questions
Is SeekOut better than Truffle?
Only for the problem SeekOut was built for. If the people you need are not applying, SeekOut searches 1B+ profiles and your ATS and drafts outreach to them. If you have more applicants than time, Truffle scores resumes, one-way interviews and assessments and ranks everyone with evidence. Many small teams need the second; many enterprise sourcing teams need the first.
SeekOut vs Truffle pricing: which costs less?
They are billed on different units, so convert both to a cost per role. SeekOut charges per recruiter seat, shows a figure only for Sourcing Core, and bills its team plans annually. Truffle publishes every plan as a monthly credit pool, where a resume, an assessment and a one-way interview each use a set number of credits.
Does Truffle do sourcing?
Not on its own pages. Truffle screens people who reach you: through its position link, imported resumes, Indeed applications or your ATS. It describes no search of outside profiles and no outbound campaigns. Pair it with a sourcing tool if your roles need people who are not applying.
Are Truffle interviews live?
No. Truffle describes its interviews as one-way, in video or audio, completed on the candidate's own time with no scheduling. You set the questions; candidates record answers; Truffle scores them and returns full transcripts, AI summaries and what it calls Candidate Shorts.
Can I use SeekOut and Truffle together?
Yes, and a shared ATS makes it simple. SeekOut lists Ashby among its ATS partners, and Truffle connects to Ashby natively, sending screening invites from a chosen stage and pushing scores back. Source and engage in SeekOut, then let Truffle screen whoever applies.
Which ATSs does Truffle integrate with?
Natively with Ashby, Breezy HR and Indeed. Its integrations page lists 9 apps including Workable, Bullhorn, JazzHR, Recruitee and Teamtailor, and says anything else connects through Zapier or its REST API. It also works with no ATS at all.
Does SeekOut have a free trial?
Yes. Its pricing page offers 14 days of SeekOut Sourcing Core with no credit card and no contract commitment. Truffle's trial is 7 days with 30 credits, also with no card.
Explore: SeekOut review · Truffle review · Truffle alternatives · SeekOut alternatives · hireEZ vs Truffle