Greenhouse vs Ashby, and which ATS suits your stage of growth
Greenhouse vs Ashby is mostly a question of where you are. Ashby suits startups and growth companies that want ATS, CRM, scheduling and deep analytics in one product, with a published entry price. Greenhouse suits teams that want structured interviewing, a larger integration catalogue and tiered governance, quoted privately.
Greenhouse vs Ashby at a glance
- Ashby sells plans by company size and shows a price for its plan up to 100 employees
- Greenhouse sells Core, Plus and Pro, all quoted privately
- Ashby builds deep reporting into the ATS; it even sells that analytics layer for other ATSs
- Greenhouse lists over 400 pre-built integrations; Ashby lists 250 or more
- Greenhouse includes its AI Notetaker on every plan; Ashby sells its notetaker as an add-on
Greenhouse vs Ashby, side by side
Each row is taken from the vendor's own pricing, product or integrations page on 5 October 2026.
| What you are comparing | Greenhouse | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| How it positions itself | A hiring platform built on structured hiring, "Better signal. Human judgment. One platform." | "The all-in-one recruiting platform" covering ATS, CRM and sourcing, scheduling and analytics |
| Plans | Core, Plus and Pro | Foundations (up to 100 employees), Plus (101 to 1,000), Enterprise (1,000 and up), and Ashby Analytics |
| Price published | No. Quoted on plan, hiring volume and complexity | Yes for Foundations. Plus and Enterprise are quoted on company size, usage and commitment |
| Outbound sourcing | Prospect pools, a prospecting Chrome plugin, contact lookups and email automation | Multi-step sequences across email and LinkedIn InMail, a Chrome extension and a monthly email lookup allotment |
| AI in screening | Real Talent matching on Core, fraud and spam detection from Plus | AI assisted application review against criteria you define, plus fraudulent candidate detection |
| Interview recording | AI Notetaker included from Core, and a separate Voice AI interviewing product | AI Notetaker listed as a paid add-on on every plan |
| Integrations | "Over 400 pre-built integrations and open API" | "250+ out-of-the-box integrations" and an open API described as a core product |
Plan placement can change between quarters. Ask each vendor to confirm the tier for any feature you need.
Where the two products split
Ashby's argument is consolidation. Its plan comparison runs from sequences and email lookups through interview plans, offers with e-signature and approval chains, to custom dashboards and an AI assisted report builder. The pitch is that a recruiting team can drop several point tools and still get reporting good enough that Ashby sells it separately as Ashby Analytics.
Greenhouse's argument is discipline at scale. Interview kits and scorecards are in every plan, governance grows tier by tier, and the integration catalogue is the larger of the two. A company already running a stack of specialist tools often finds Greenhouse plugs into more of them, while a younger company with no stack yet may get more from Ashby out of the box.
Choose Greenhouse if, choose Ashby if
You are under 100 employees, hiring your first recruiter, and want to see a price before talking to sales.
Foundations is built for that band and its price is on the pricing page, with monthly or yearly terms.
Which features sit in add-ons, such as the AI Notetaker and advanced scheduling.
Your head of talent spends Fridays exporting data to build pipeline and pass-through reports.
Custom dashboards, drilldowns, scheduled delivery and a recruiting planner are part of the product's core design.
Whether report filtering is Basic or Advanced on the plan you are quoted.
Recruiters run outbound themselves and want sequences inside the ATS rather than a separate engagement tool.
Sequences cover email and LinkedIn InMail stages, with shared templates, bulk send and AI personalisation tokens.
How many email lookups are included each month and what extra batches cost.
You already run 8 or more recruiting tools and do not want to replace them.
Greenhouse lists over 400 pre-built integrations, the larger catalogue of the two.
Whether each of your tools has a partner built integration or needs the API.
You need audit logs, a developer sandbox and tight data controls for a security review.
Those sit in Greenhouse Pro, which is aimed at teams operating across regions and business units.
What moving from Plus to Pro adds to the quote.
You want first round screening calls handled by AI inside your ATS vendor's own product.
Greenhouse Voice AI runs a two-way voice interview on your questions and scoring criteria, and every score is overridable.
Whether Voice AI is priced into your plan or bought on its own.
Greenhouse and Ashby in day to day use
In Ashby, a coordinator's day runs on interview plan automation: moving a candidate to a stage can send a booking link, a questionnaire or a take-home without anyone clicking. Interviewer limits, buffers and Slack channels per candidate are configured once. Recruiters sourcing outbound stay in the same tool, enrolling people from a sourcing project straight into a sequence.
In Greenhouse, the interviewer experience is the anchor. Each interviewer works from a kit and submits a scorecard, and the recruiter manages scheduling suggestions, self-scheduling links and stage transitions around that. Texting and sourcing automation arrive at Plus, so a Core team runs outreach with email automation and prospect pools.
Included in the plan, or sold as an extra
Quotes for these two products often differ because of add-ons. This is where each one draws the line, per its own plan comparison.
| Feature | Greenhouse | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| AI interview notetaker | Included from Core | Paid add-on on every plan |
| Candidate texting | From Plus | Included with a monthly or per seat message allowance |
| Advanced scheduling | Scheduling automation rules listed in the plan comparison | AI Auto-Scheduler, calendar holds and interviewer training in an Advanced Scheduling add-on |
| Auto-reject rules | Auto-reject and auto-advance in Pro | Auto-reject rules based on application answers listed in the ATS section |
| Fraud detection | From Plus, with CLEAR ID verification | Fraudulent candidate detection listed in the ATS section |
| Analytics for another ATS | No separate analytics product on its pricing page; a BI Connector from Plus | Ashby Analytics sits on top of an existing ATS for companies of 100 or more |
Read on greenhouse.com/pricing and ashbyhq.com/pricing, 5 October 2026.
Ashby vs Greenhouse pricing models
Ashby is the only one of the two that shows a figure, and only for Foundations, priced by company size band with a discount for annual commitment. Plus and Enterprise are quoted on company size, usage and commitment. Greenhouse shows no figure at all and quotes on plan, hiring volume and organisational complexity.
When the quotes arrive, line up the add-ons. An Ashby quote can look lean until the notetaker, advanced scheduling or extra email lookups are added. A Greenhouse quote can jump between tiers when you need texting or fraud detection, which start at Plus.
Using both
Ashby Analytics is sold "for your existing ATS" to companies of 100 or more employees. A Greenhouse customer who wants Ashby's reporting can, in principle, add that layer without replacing the ATS. Ask Ashby which ATSs it currently reads from.
Adding a sourcing and interview layer
A plain English brief turned into search filters across ~900M public profiles.
When the pipeline is thin, The Cognitive finds people who have not applied: a one line brief becomes filters across ~900M public profiles, with verified emails and phones to reveal. Anyone you pick can take a live AI video interview of 10 or 20 minutes. Imported Greenhouse or Ashby candidates get the report link as a note; stages never move.
Keep reading
Ashby alternatives · Greenhouse alternatives · Greenhouse pricing · Lever vs Ashby
Frequently asked questions
Is Ashby better than Greenhouse?
It depends on stage and stack. Ashby is a strong fit for startups and growth companies that want one product covering ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics, with a published entry price. Greenhouse fits better when you need a large integration catalogue, structured interview kits on every plan and enterprise governance in its Pro tier.
Ashby vs Greenhouse pricing: what is the difference?
Ashby publishes a price for its Foundations plan, which covers companies up to 100 employees, and quotes Plus and Enterprise on size, usage and commitment. Greenhouse publishes no price and quotes Core, Plus and Pro on plan, hiring volume and complexity. Some Ashby features, like the AI Notetaker, are paid add-ons.
Can I use Ashby with Greenhouse?
Yes, in one specific way. Ashby sells Ashby Analytics as advanced reporting on top of an existing ATS for companies of 100 or more employees. Running both as full ATSs would split your candidate records, so most teams pick one and migrate.
Is Ashby good for startups?
Ashby built its Foundations plan for companies up to 100 employees and shows its price on the pricing page, which makes it easy to evaluate early. It includes sourcing sequences, scheduling, offers and core dashboards. Larger companies move to Plus or Enterprise, both quoted.
Does Greenhouse or Ashby have better reporting?
Ashby puts more weight on reporting: custom dashboards, drilldowns, an AI assisted report builder and a recruiting planner, and it sells the same layer for other ATSs. Greenhouse offers essential reports on Core, custom reports and dashboards, and a BI Connector from Plus for teams that report in their own tools.
Which has more integrations, Greenhouse or Ashby?
Greenhouse states over 400 pre-built integrations plus an open API. Ashby states 250 or more out-of-the-box integrations and calls its open API a core product. Check your own tools by name in each marketplace before deciding on the count alone.
Is it hard to switch from Greenhouse to Ashby?
Any ATS switch involves migrating candidates, jobs and history, and rebuilding interview plans and integrations. Ask Ashby what data it imports from Greenhouse, how long a migration took for a customer your size, and which of your integrations it supports before you set a cutover date.
Explore: Ashby alternatives · Greenhouse alternatives · Greenhouse vs Lever · Ashby integration